↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Can Male Circumcision Have an Impact on the HIV Epidemic in Men Who Have Sex with Men?

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
Title
Can Male Circumcision Have an Impact on the HIV Epidemic in Men Who Have Sex with Men?
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0102960
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steven M. Goodreau, Nicole B. Carnegie, Eric Vittinghoff, Javier R. Lama, Jonathan D. Fuchs, Jorge Sanchez, Susan P. Buchbinder

Abstract

Three trials have demonstrated the prophylactic effect of male circumcision (MC) for HIV acquisition among heterosexuals, and MC interventions are underway throughout sub-Saharan Africa. Similar efforts for men who have sex with men (MSM) are stymied by the potential for circumcised MSM to acquire HIV easily through receptive sex and transmit easily through insertive sex. Existing work suggests that MC for MSM should reach its maximum potential in settings where sexual role segregation is historically high and relatively stable across the lifecourse; HIV incidence among MSM is high; reported willingness for prophylactic circumcision is high; and pre-existing circumcision rates are low. We aim to identify the likely public health impact that MC interventions among MSM would have in one setting that fulfills these conditions-Peru-as a theoretical upper bound for their effectiveness among MSM generally.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 70 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 17%
Student > Master 9 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 11 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 31%
Social Sciences 8 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Psychology 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 19 27%