↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Survey of Academic Field Experiences (SAFE): Trainees Report Harassment and Assault

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
328 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
670 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Survey of Academic Field Experiences (SAFE): Trainees Report Harassment and Assault
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0102172
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathryn B. H. Clancy, Robin G. Nelson, Julienne N. Rutherford, Katie Hinde

Abstract

Little is known about the climate of the scientific fieldwork setting as it relates to gendered experiences, sexual harassment, and sexual assault. We conducted an internet-based survey of field scientists (N = 666) to characterize these experiences. Codes of conduct and sexual harassment policies were not regularly encountered by respondents, while harassment and assault were commonly experienced by respondents during trainee career stages. Women trainees were the primary targets; their perpetrators were predominantly senior to them professionally within the research team. Male trainees were more often targeted by their peers at the research site. Few respondents were aware of mechanisms to report incidents; most who did report were unsatisfied with the outcome. These findings suggest that policies emphasizing safety, inclusivity, and collegiality have the potential to improve field experiences of a diversity of researchers, especially during early career stages. These include better awareness of mechanisms for direct and oblique reporting of harassment and assault and, the implementation of productive response mechanisms when such behaviors are reported. Principal investigators are particularly well positioned to influence workplace culture at their field sites.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,334 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 670 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 18 3%
Australia 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 639 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 154 23%
Researcher 101 15%
Student > Master 90 13%
Student > Bachelor 52 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 41 6%
Other 121 18%
Unknown 111 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 158 24%
Social Sciences 109 16%
Environmental Science 58 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 44 7%
Psychology 30 4%
Other 131 20%
Unknown 140 21%