↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

How to Boost Positive Interpretations? A Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Cognitive Bias Modification for Interpretation

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
164 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
225 Mendeley
Title
How to Boost Positive Interpretations? A Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Cognitive Bias Modification for Interpretation
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0100925
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudia Menne-Lothmann, Wolfgang Viechtbauer, Petra Höhn, Zuzana Kasanova, Simone P. Haller, Marjan Drukker, Jim van Os, Marieke Wichers, Jennifer Y. F. Lau

Abstract

The current meta-analysis explores the strength of effects of cognitive bias modification training for interpretation bias (CBM-I) on positive (i.e., adaptive) interpretations and mood as well as the training and sample characteristics influencing these effects. Data-bases were searched with the key words "interpret* bias AND training" and "interpret* bias AND modif*". Reference lists of identified articles were checked and authors of identified articles were contacted for further relevant articles and unpublished data. Studies were reviewed for inclusion with eligibility criteria being that the study (a) aimed to target interpretation biases through any kind of training, (b) assessed mood and/or interpretation bias as outcome measures, (c) allocated individuals to training conditions at random, and (d) recruited adult samples. A meta-analytic multilevel mixed-effects model was employed to assess standardized mean changes in interpretation bias, negative mood, and emotional reactivity. In addition, several training and sample characteristics were explored for their potential to enhance benign training effectiveness. On average, benign CBM-I resulted in an increase in positive interpretation bias (p<.01) and a decrease in negative mood state (p<.001), but did not affect emotional reactivity. These effects were not consistently different from control conditions with no or neutral training. However, within benign training conditions imagery instructions and more training sessions were related to larger cognitive and mood effects, whereas feedback about training performance and inclusion of non-benign training items (instead of including benign items only) boosted cognitive effects only. Finally, training was more effective in women (cognitive and mood effects) and presumably samples with symptomatic emotional dysregulation (cognitive effects). Although the effects of emotional dysregulation and number of training sessions could not well be distinguished, there is an indication that when used with imagery instructions and more training sessions, benign CBM-I can be employed as a useful complementary treatment to usual psychotherapies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 225 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Croatia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 223 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 23%
Student > Bachelor 35 16%
Student > Master 34 15%
Researcher 26 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 8%
Other 23 10%
Unknown 36 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 144 64%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 3%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Sports and Recreations 5 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Other 14 6%
Unknown 46 20%