↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Quantifying ‘Causality’ in Complex Systems: Understanding Transfer Entropy

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Quantifying ‘Causality’ in Complex Systems: Understanding Transfer Entropy
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0099462
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fatimah Abdul Razak, Henrik Jeldtoft Jensen

Abstract

'Causal' direction is of great importance when dealing with complex systems. Often big volumes of data in the form of time series are available and it is important to develop methods that can inform about possible causal connections between the different observables. Here we investigate the ability of the Transfer Entropy measure to identify causal relations embedded in emergent coherent correlations. We do this by firstly applying Transfer Entropy to an amended Ising model. In addition we use a simple Random Transition model to test the reliability of Transfer Entropy as a measure of 'causal' direction in the presence of stochastic fluctuations. In particular we systematically study the effect of the finite size of data sets.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 99 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 35%
Researcher 21 19%
Student > Master 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 4%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 16 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 18 16%
Physics and Astronomy 16 14%
Engineering 15 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 9%
Psychology 7 6%
Other 25 22%
Unknown 21 19%