↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Examining Effects of Anticipated Stigma, Centrality, Salience, Internalization, and Outness on Psychological Distress for People with Concealable Stigmatized Identities

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
158 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
298 Mendeley
Title
Examining Effects of Anticipated Stigma, Centrality, Salience, Internalization, and Outness on Psychological Distress for People with Concealable Stigmatized Identities
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0096977
Pubmed ID
Authors

Diane M. Quinn, Michelle K. Williams, Francisco Quintana, Jennifer L. Gaskins, Nicole M. Overstreet, Alefiyah Pishori, Valerie A. Earnshaw, Giselle Perez, Stephenie R. Chaudoir

Abstract

Understanding how stigmatized identities contribute to increased rates of depression and anxiety is critical to stigma reduction and mental health treatment. There has been little research testing multiple aspects of stigmatized identities simultaneously. In the current study, we collected data from a diverse, urban, adult community sample of people with a concealed stigmatized identity (CSI). We targeted 5 specific CSIs--mental illness, substance abuse, experience of domestic violence, experience of sexual assault, and experience of childhood abuse--that have been shown to put people at risk for increased psychological distress. We collected measures of the anticipation of being devalued by others if the identity became known (anticipated stigma), the level of defining oneself by the stigmatized identity (centrality), the frequency of thinking about the identity (salience), the extent of agreement with negative stereotypes about the identity (internalized stigma), and extent to which other people currently know about the identity (outness). Results showed that greater anticipated stigma, greater identity salience, and lower levels of outness each uniquely and significantly predicted variance in increased psychological distress (a composite of depression and anxiety). In examining communalities and differences across the five identities, we found that mean levels of the stigma variables differed across the identities, with people with substance abuse and mental illness reporting greater anticipated and internalized stigma. However, the prediction pattern of the variables for psychological distress was similar across the substance abuse, mental illness, domestic violence, and childhood abuse identities (but not sexual assault). Understanding which components of stigmatized identities predict distress can lead to more effective treatment for people experiencing psychological distress.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 298 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 290 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 61 20%
Student > Master 40 13%
Student > Bachelor 40 13%
Researcher 30 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 29 10%
Other 35 12%
Unknown 63 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 110 37%
Social Sciences 40 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Other 25 8%
Unknown 76 26%