↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Feasibility, Acceptability, and Potential Effectiveness of Dignity Therapy for People with Motor Neurone Disease

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
Title
Feasibility, Acceptability, and Potential Effectiveness of Dignity Therapy for People with Motor Neurone Disease
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0096888
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brenda Bentley, Moira O'Connor, Robert Kane, Lauren J. Breen

Abstract

Motor neurone disease (MND) practice guidelines suggest developing interventions that will promote hope, meaning, and dignity to alleviate psychological distress, but very little research has been done. This study begins to address this need by exploring the use of dignity therapy with people with MND. Dignity therapy is a brief psychotherapy that promotes hope, meaning and dignity, and enhances the end of life for people with advanced cancer. The aims of this study are to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and potential effectiveness of dignity therapy for people with MND.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Unknown 164 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 17%
Student > Master 27 16%
Student > Bachelor 24 14%
Student > Postgraduate 12 7%
Researcher 11 7%
Other 28 17%
Unknown 37 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 50 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 14%
Unspecified 5 3%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 40 24%