↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Impacts of Removing Badgers on Localised Counts of Hedgehogs

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
289 X users
facebook
8 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
Title
Impacts of Removing Badgers on Localised Counts of Hedgehogs
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0095477
Pubmed ID
Authors

Iain D. Trewby, Richard Young, Robbie A. McDonald, Gavin J. Wilson, John Davison, Neil Walker, Andrew Robertson, C. Patrick Doncaster, Richard J. Delahay

Abstract

Experimental evidence of the interactions among mammalian predators that eat or compete with one another is rare, due to the ethical and logistical challenges of managing wild populations in a controlled and replicated way. Here, we report on the opportunistic use of a replicated and controlled culling experiment (the Randomised Badger Culling Trial) to investigate the relationship between two sympatric predators: European badgers Meles meles and western European hedgehogs Erinaceus europaeus. In areas of preferred habitat (amenity grassland), counts of hedgehogs more than doubled over a 5-year period from the start of badger culling (from 0.9 ha-1 pre-cull to 2.4 ha-1 post-cull), whereas hedgehog counts did not change where there was no badger culling (0.3-0.3 hedgehogs ha-1). This trial provides experimental evidence for mesopredator release as an outcome of management of a top predator.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 289 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 113 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 22%
Researcher 20 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 11%
Student > Master 12 10%
Other 5 4%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 28 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 53 46%
Environmental Science 19 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 <1%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 29 25%