↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

A Tiered Analytical Approach for Investigating Poor Quality Emergency Contraceptives

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
12 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
17 X users

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
Title
A Tiered Analytical Approach for Investigating Poor Quality Emergency Contraceptives
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0095353
Pubmed ID
Authors

María Eugenia Monge, Prabha Dwivedi, Manshui Zhou, Michael Payne, Chris Harris, Blaine House, Yvonne Juggins, Peter Cizmarik, Paul N. Newton, Facundo M. Fernández, David Jenkins

Abstract

Reproductive health has been deleteriously affected by poor quality medicines. Emergency contraceptive pills (ECPs) are an important birth control method that women can use after unprotected coitus for reducing the risk of pregnancy. In response to the detection of poor quality ECPs commercially available in the Peruvian market we developed a tiered multi-platform analytical strategy. In a survey to assess ECP medicine quality in Peru, 7 out of 25 different batches showed inadequate release of levonorgestrel by dissolution testing or improper amounts of active ingredient. One batch was found to contain a wrong active ingredient, with no detectable levonorgestrel. By combining ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry-mass spectrometry (UHPLC-IMS-MS) and direct analysis in real time MS (DART-MS) the unknown compound was identified as the antibiotic sulfamethoxazole. Quantitation by UHPLC-triple quadrupole tandem MS (QqQ-MS/MS) indicated that the wrong ingredient was present in the ECP sample at levels which could have significant physiological effects. Further chemical characterization of the poor quality ECP samples included the identification of the excipients by 2D Diffusion-Ordered Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (DOSY 1H NMR) indicating the presence of lactose and magnesium stearate.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 24%
Researcher 10 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Other 3 5%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 13 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 22%
Chemistry 9 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 14 24%