↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Modelling the Force of Infection for Hepatitis A in an Urban Population-Based Survey: A Comparison of Transmission Patterns in Brazilian Macro-Regions

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Modelling the Force of Infection for Hepatitis A in an Urban Population-Based Survey: A Comparison of Transmission Patterns in Brazilian Macro-Regions
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0094622
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ricardo Arraes de Alencar Ximenes, Celina Maria Turchi Martelli, Marcos Amaku, Ana Marli C. Sartori, Patricia Coelho de Soárez, Hillegonda Maria Dutilh Novaes, Leila Maria Moreira Beltrão Pereira, Regina Célia Moreira, Gerusa Maria Figueiredo, Raymundo Soares de Azevedo

Abstract

This study aimed to identify the transmission pattern of hepatitis A (HA) infection based on a primary dataset from the Brazilian National Hepatitis Survey in a pre-vaccination context. The national survey conducted in urban areas disclosed two epidemiological scenarios with low and intermediate HA endemicity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 4%
Unknown 45 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 15%
Researcher 5 11%
Professor 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Other 12 26%
Unknown 5 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 43%
Mathematics 3 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 6%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 9 19%