↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

An Attractor-Based Complexity Measurement for Boolean Recurrent Neural Networks

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
An Attractor-Based Complexity Measurement for Boolean Recurrent Neural Networks
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0094204
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jérémie Cabessa, Alessandro E. P. Villa

Abstract

We provide a novel refined attractor-based complexity measurement for Boolean recurrent neural networks that represents an assessment of their computational power in terms of the significance of their attractor dynamics. This complexity measurement is achieved by first proving a computational equivalence between Boolean recurrent neural networks and some specific class of ω-automata, and then translating the most refined classification of ω-automata to the Boolean neural network context. As a result, a hierarchical classification of Boolean neural networks based on their attractive dynamics is obtained, thus providing a novel refined attractor-based complexity measurement for Boolean recurrent neural networks. These results provide new theoretical insights to the computational and dynamical capabilities of neural networks according to their attractive potentialities. An application of our findings is illustrated by the analysis of the dynamics of a simplified model of the basal ganglia-thalamocortical network simulated by a Boolean recurrent neural network. This example shows the significance of measuring network complexity, and how our results bear new founding elements for the understanding of the complexity of real brain circuits.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 3%
Unknown 36 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 30%
Other 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Researcher 3 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Other 7 19%
Unknown 7 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 6 16%
Computer Science 5 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Mathematics 3 8%
Engineering 3 8%
Other 10 27%
Unknown 7 19%