↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Meta-Milgram: An Empirical Synthesis of the Obedience Experiments

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
58 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
205 Mendeley
Title
Meta-Milgram: An Empirical Synthesis of the Obedience Experiments
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0093927
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nick Haslam, Steve Loughnan, Gina Perry

Abstract

Milgram's famous experiment contained 23 small-sample conditions that elicited striking variations in obedient responding. A synthesis of these diverse conditions could clarify the factors that influence obedience in the Milgram paradigm. We assembled data from the 21 conditions (N = 740) in which obedience involved progression to maximum voltage (overall rate 43.6%) and coded these conditions on 14 properties pertaining to the learner, the teacher, the experimenter, the learner-teacher relation, the experimenter-teacher relation, and the experimental setting. Logistic regression analysis indicated that eight factors influenced the likelihood that teachers continued to the 450 volt shock: the experimenter's directiveness, legitimacy, and consistency; group pressure on the teacher to disobey; the indirectness, proximity, and intimacy of the relation between teacher and learner; and the distance between the teacher and the experimenter. Implications are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 199 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 47 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 11%
Student > Master 19 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Researcher 10 5%
Other 37 18%
Unknown 59 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 89 43%
Social Sciences 18 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 3%
Other 18 9%
Unknown 59 29%