↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Completing the Results of the 2013 Boston Marathon

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
twitter
11 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Completing the Results of the 2013 Boston Marathon
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0093800
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dorit Hammerling, Matthew Cefalu, Jessi Cisewski, Francesca Dominici, Giovanni Parmigiani, Charles Paulson, Richard L. Smith

Abstract

The 2013 Boston marathon was disrupted by two bombs placed near the finish line. The bombs resulted in three deaths and several hundred injuries. Of lesser concern, in the immediate aftermath, was the fact that nearly 6,000 runners failed to finish the race. We were approached by the marathon's organizers, the Boston Athletic Association (BAA), and asked to recommend a procedure for projecting finish times for the runners who could not complete the race. With assistance from the BAA, we created a dataset consisting of all the runners in the 2013 race who reached the halfway point but failed to finish, as well as all runners from the 2010 and 2011 Boston marathons. The data consist of split times from each of the 5 km sections of the course, as well as the final 2.2 km (from 40 km to the finish). The statistical objective is to predict the missing split times for the runners who failed to finish in 2013. We set this problem in the context of the matrix completion problem, examples of which include imputing missing data in DNA microarray experiments, and the Netflix prize problem. We propose five prediction methods and create a validation dataset to measure their performance by mean squared error and other measures. The best method used local regression based on a K-nearest-neighbors algorithm (KNN method), though several other methods produced results of similar quality. We show how the results were used to create projected times for the 2013 runners and discuss potential for future application of the same methodology. We present the whole project as an example of reproducible research, in that we are able to make the full data and all the algorithms we have used publicly available, which may facilitate future research extending the methods or proposing completely different approaches.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Student > Master 3 14%
Other 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Other 4 19%
Unknown 5 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 29%
Computer Science 3 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 10%
Sports and Recreations 2 10%
Mathematics 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 33%