↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

A Community of Curious Souls: An Analysis of Commenting Behavior on TED Talks Videos

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
twitter
45 X users
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
Title
A Community of Curious Souls: An Analysis of Commenting Behavior on TED Talks Videos
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0093609
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew Tsou, Mike Thelwall, Philippe Mongeon, Cassidy R. Sugimoto

Abstract

The TED (Technology, Entertainment, Design) Talks website hosts video recordings of various experts, celebrities, academics, and others who discuss their topics of expertise. Funded by advertising and members but provided free online, TED Talks have been viewed over a billion times and are a science communication phenomenon. Although the organization has been derided for its populist slant and emphasis on entertainment value, no previous research has assessed audience reactions in order to determine the degree to which presenter characteristics and platform affect the reception of a video. This article addresses this issue via a content analysis of comments left on both the TED website and the YouTube platform (on which TED Talks videos are also posted). It was found that commenters were more likely to discuss the characteristics of a presenter on YouTube, whereas commenters tended to engage with the talk content on the TED website. In addition, people tended to be more emotional when the speaker was a woman (by leaving comments that were either positive or negative). The results can inform future efforts to popularize science amongst the public, as well as to provide insights for those looking to disseminate information via Internet videos.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Canada 2 1%
Australia 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 144 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 18%
Student > Master 25 16%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Researcher 10 7%
Other 9 6%
Other 32 21%
Unknown 37 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 39 26%
Computer Science 14 9%
Linguistics 12 8%
Psychology 7 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Other 30 20%
Unknown 44 29%