↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Shared Sanitation versus Individual Household Latrines: A Systematic Review of Health Outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
129 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
334 Mendeley
Title
Shared Sanitation versus Individual Household Latrines: A Systematic Review of Health Outcomes
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0093300
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marieke Heijnen, Oliver Cumming, Rachel Peletz, Gabrielle Ka-Seen Chan, Joe Brown, Kelly Baker, Thomas Clasen

Abstract

More than 761 million people rely on shared sanitation facilities. These have historically been excluded from international sanitation targets, regardless of the service level, due to concerns about acceptability, hygiene and access. In connection with a proposed change in such policy, we undertook this review to identify and summarize existing evidence that compares health outcomes associated with shared sanitation versus individual household latrines.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 334 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Unknown 326 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 64 19%
Researcher 54 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 16%
Student > Bachelor 27 8%
Other 22 7%
Other 50 15%
Unknown 64 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 53 16%
Social Sciences 42 13%
Engineering 40 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 35 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 7%
Other 56 17%
Unknown 84 25%