↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Risk Behaviors and Risk Factors for HIV Infection among Participants in the Bangkok Tenofovir Study, an HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Trial among People Who Inject Drugs

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
Title
Risk Behaviors and Risk Factors for HIV Infection among Participants in the Bangkok Tenofovir Study, an HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Trial among People Who Inject Drugs
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0092809
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Martin, Suphak Vanichseni, Pravan Suntharasamai, Udomsak Sangkum, Philip A. Mock, Manoj Leethochawalit, Sithisat Chiamwongpaet, Roman J. Gvetadze, Somyot Kittimunkong, Marcel E. Curlin, Dararat Worrajittanon, Janet M. McNicholl, Lynn A. Paxton, Kachit Choopanya

Abstract

HIV spread rapidly among people who inject drugs in Bangkok in the late 1980s. In recent years, changes in drug use and HIV-associated risk behaviors have been reported. We examined data from the Bangkok Tenofovir Study, an HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis trial conducted among people who inject drugs, to assess participant risk behavior and drug use, and to identify risk factors for HIV infection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 112 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 17%
Researcher 14 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Student > Postgraduate 7 6%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 36 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 10%
Social Sciences 7 6%
Psychology 5 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 39 35%