ā†“ Skip to main content

PLOS

Everything Is Permitted? People Intuitively Judge Immorality as Representative of Atheists

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
20 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
twitter
246 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
4 Redditors
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
101 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
Title
Everything Is Permitted? People Intuitively Judge Immorality as Representative of Atheists
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0092302
Pubmed ID
Authors

Will M. Gervais

Abstract

Scientific research yields inconsistent and contradictory evidence relating religion to moral judgments and outcomes, yet most people on earth nonetheless view belief in God (or gods) as central to morality, and many view atheists with suspicion and scorn. To evaluate intuitions regarding a causal link between religion and morality, this paper tested intuitive moral judgments of atheists and other groups. Across five experiments (Nā€Š=ā€Š1,152), American participants intuitively judged a wide variety of immoral acts (e.g., serial murder, consensual incest, necrobestiality, cannibalism) as representative of atheists, but not of eleven other religious, ethnic, and cultural groups. Even atheist participants judged immoral acts as more representative of atheists than of other groups. These findings demonstrate a prevalent intuition that belief in God serves a necessary function in inhibiting immoral conduct, and may help explain persistent negative perceptions of atheists.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 246 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 123 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 23 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 16%
Researcher 15 12%
Student > Master 14 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Other 22 17%
Unknown 24 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 53 41%
Social Sciences 18 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 9%
Philosophy 4 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 2%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 29 23%