↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Low 2012–13 Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Associated with Mutation in the Egg-Adapted H3N2 Vaccine Strain Not Antigenic Drift in Circulating Viruses

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
114 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
30 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
346 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
232 Mendeley
Title
Low 2012–13 Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Associated with Mutation in the Egg-Adapted H3N2 Vaccine Strain Not Antigenic Drift in Circulating Viruses
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0092153
Pubmed ID
Authors

Danuta M. Skowronski, Naveed Z. Janjua, Gaston De Serres, Suzana Sabaiduc, Alireza Eshaghi, James A. Dickinson, Kevin Fonseca, Anne-Luise Winter, Jonathan B. Gubbay, Mel Krajden, Martin Petric, Hugues Charest, Nathalie Bastien, Trijntje L. Kwindt, Salaheddin M. Mahmud, Paul Van Caeseele, Yan Li

Abstract

Influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) is generally interpreted in the context of vaccine match/mismatch to circulating strains with evolutionary drift in the latter invoked to explain reduced protection. During the 2012-13 season, however, detailed genotypic and phenotypic characterization shows that low VE was instead related to mutations in the egg-adapted H3N2 vaccine strain rather than antigenic drift in circulating viruses.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 232 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 229 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 51 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 19%
Student > Bachelor 25 11%
Student > Master 21 9%
Other 12 5%
Other 26 11%
Unknown 53 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 24 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 5 2%
Other 33 14%
Unknown 66 28%