Title |
Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System vs. Usual Medical Treatment for Menorrhagia: An Economic Evaluation Alongside a Randomised Controlled Trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2014
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0091891 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sabina Sanghera, Tracy Elizabeth Roberts, Pelham Barton, Emma Frew, Jane Daniels, Lee Middleton, Laura Gennard, Joe Kai, Janesh Kumar Gupta |
Abstract |
To undertake an economic evaluation alongside the largest randomised controlled trial comparing Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device ('LNG-IUS') and usual medical treatment for women with menorrhagia in primary care; and compare the cost-effectiveness findings using two alternative measures of quality of life. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 5 | 63% |
United States | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
Scientists | 3 | 38% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 58 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 12 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 14% |
Researcher | 8 | 14% |
Other | 4 | 7% |
Lecturer | 3 | 5% |
Other | 7 | 12% |
Unknown | 17 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 34% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 15% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Sports and Recreations | 2 | 3% |
Other | 6 | 10% |
Unknown | 18 | 31% |