↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Linguistic Phylogenies Support Back-Migration from Beringia to Asia

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
22 news outlets
blogs
8 blogs
twitter
59 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
18 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
4 Google+ users
reddit
3 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
Title
Linguistic Phylogenies Support Back-Migration from Beringia to Asia
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0091722
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark A. Sicoli, Gary Holton

Abstract

Recent arguments connecting Na-Dene languages of North America with Yeniseian languages of Siberia have been used to assert proof for the origin of Native Americans in central or western Asia. We apply phylogenetic methods to test support for this hypothesis against an alternative hypothesis that Yeniseian represents a back-migration to Asia from a Beringian ancestral population. We coded a linguistic dataset of typological features and used neighbor-joining network algorithms and Bayesian model comparison based on Bayes factors to test the fit between the data and the linguistic phylogenies modeling two dispersal hypotheses. Our results support that a Dene-Yeniseian connection more likely represents radiation out of Beringia with back-migration into central Asia than a migration from central or western Asia to North America.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Brazil 1 1%
New Zealand 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Unknown 82 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 22%
Researcher 16 18%
Student > Master 15 17%
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Professor 10 11%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 1 1%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 29%
Linguistics 20 22%
Social Sciences 9 10%
Arts and Humanities 7 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 6%
Other 19 21%
Unknown 3 3%