↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

High Urban Breeding Densities Do Not Disrupt Genetic Monogamy in a Bird Species

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
10 X users

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
Title
High Urban Breeding Densities Do Not Disrupt Genetic Monogamy in a Bird Species
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0091314
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sol Rodriguez-Martínez, Martina Carrete, Séverine Roques, Natalia Rebolo-Ifrán, José L. Tella

Abstract

Urbanization causes widespread endangerment of biodiversity worldwide. However, some species successfully colonize cities reaching higher densities than in their rural habitats. In these cases, although urban city dwellers may apparently be taking advantage of these new environments, they also face new ecological conditions that may induce behavioural changes. For example, the frequency of alternative reproductive behaviours such as extra-pair paternity and intraspecific brood parasitism might increase with breeding densities. Here, using a panel of 17 microsatellites, we tested whether increments in breeding densities such as those associated with urban invasion processes alter genetic monogamy in the burrowing owl Athene cunicularia. Our results show low rates of extra-pair paternity (1.47%), but relatively high levels of intraspecific brood parasitism (8.82%). However, we were not able to detect differences in the frequency at which either alternative reproductive behaviour occurs along a strong breeding density gradient. Further research is needed to properly ascertain the role of other social and ecological factors in the frequency at which this species presents alternative reproductive strategies. Meanwhile, our results suggest that genetic monogamy is maintained despite the increment in conspecific density associated with a recent urban invasion process.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 89 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 23%
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 13%
Student > Master 12 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 9 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 53 59%
Environmental Science 12 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Engineering 3 3%
Psychology 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 16 18%