| Title |
Systematic Reviews of Animal Studies; Missing Link in Translational Research?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0089981 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Judith van Luijk, Brenda Bakker, Maroeska M. Rovers, Merel Ritskes-Hoitinga, Rob B. M. de Vries, Marlies Leenaars |
| Abstract |
The methodological quality of animal studies is an important factor hampering the translation of results from animal studies to a clinical setting. Systematic reviews of animal studies may provide a suitable method to assess and thereby improve their methodological quality. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 50% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 80 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 13 | 16% |
| Unknown | 19 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 18% |
| Unknown | 28 | 34% |