↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Shale Gas, Wind and Water: Assessing the Potential Cumulative Impacts of Energy Development on Ecosystem Services within the Marcellus Play

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
7 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
162 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Shale Gas, Wind and Water: Assessing the Potential Cumulative Impacts of Energy Development on Ecosystem Services within the Marcellus Play
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0089210
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeffrey S. Evans, Joseph M. Kiesecker

Abstract

Global demand for energy has increased by more than 50 percent in the last half-century, and a similar increase is projected by 2030. This demand will increasingly be met with alternative and unconventional energy sources. Development of these resources causes disturbances that strongly impact terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems. The Marcellus Shale gas play covers more than 160,934 km(2) in an area that provides drinking water for over 22 million people in several of the largest metropolitan areas in the United States (e.g. New York City, Washington DC, Philadelphia & Pittsburgh). Here we created probability surfaces representing development potential of wind and shale gas for portions of six states in the Central Appalachians. We used these predictions and published projections to model future energy build-out scenarios to quantify future potential impacts on surface drinking water. Our analysis predicts up to 106,004 new wells and 10,798 new wind turbines resulting up to 535,023 ha of impervious surface (3% of the study area) and upwards of 447,134 ha of impacted forest (2% of the study area). In light of this new energy future, mitigating the impacts of energy development will be one of the major challenges in the coming decades.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Portugal 2 1%
South Africa 2 1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 151 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 44 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 21%
Student > Master 22 14%
Student > Bachelor 17 10%
Student > Postgraduate 8 5%
Other 24 15%
Unknown 13 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 51 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 22%
Engineering 13 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 2%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 25 15%