↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Finding Friends Online: Online Activities by Deaf Students and Their Well-Being

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
Title
Finding Friends Online: Online Activities by Deaf Students and Their Well-Being
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0088351
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helen Blom, Marc Marschark, Mathijs P. J. Vervloed, Harry Knoors

Abstract

Generally, deaf and hard of hearing (D/HH) children have fewer friends than hearing peers and their friendships are of a lower quality. The research hypothesis was that using the computer to communicate with new online friends through social network sites or playing games with offline friends is associated with D/HH friendship qualities, because it removes certain communication barriers D/HH face in offline communication settings. With online questionnaires the relation between computer use and online, mixed (offline friend who you also speak in online settings), and offline friendship quality of D/HH and hearing students (18-25 years) was compared in both the Netherlands (n = 100) and the United States (n = 122). In addition, the study examined whether the different friendship qualities were related to the participants' well-being. Results showed that, in general, D/HH students' friendship qualities and levels of well-being were similar to their hearing peers. The quality of the mixed friendships was positively related to well-being. Furthermore, the frequency of pc use with both online and offline friends was positively related to friendships qualities in both hearing and D/HH students. A combination of the online and offline friendship seems to be the most important friendship type for both hearing and D/HH students and it is worthwhile to encourage this friendship type.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Israel 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Russia 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 75 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 23%
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Researcher 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 22 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 23 29%
Social Sciences 13 16%
Computer Science 6 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 8%
Philosophy 2 3%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 21 27%