↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Methods to Assess the Impact of Mass Oral Cholera Vaccination Campaigns under Real Field Conditions

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Methods to Assess the Impact of Mass Oral Cholera Vaccination Campaigns under Real Field Conditions
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0088139
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacqueline Deen, Mohammad Ali, David Sack

Abstract

There is increasing interest to use oral cholera vaccination as an additional strategy to water and sanitation interventions against endemic and epidemic cholera. There are two internationally-available and WHO-prequalified oral cholera vaccines: an inactivated vaccine containing killed whole-cells of V. cholerae O1 with recombinant cholera toxin B-subunit (WC/rBS) and a bivalent inactivated vaccine containing killed whole cells of V. cholerae O1 and V. cholerae O139 (BivWC). The efficacy, effectiveness, direct and indirect (herd) protection conferred by WC/rBS and BivWC are well established. Yet governments may need local evidence of vaccine impact to justify and scale-up mass oral cholera vaccination campaigns. We discuss various approaches to assess oral cholera vaccine protection, which may be useful to policymakers and public health workers considering deployment and evaluation of the vaccine.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 45 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 24%
Researcher 7 15%
Other 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 4 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 12 26%
Unknown 6 13%