↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Contextual and Perceptual Brain Processes Underlying Moral Cognition: A Quantitative Meta-Analysis of Moral Reasoning and Moral Emotions

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
178 Mendeley
Title
Contextual and Perceptual Brain Processes Underlying Moral Cognition: A Quantitative Meta-Analysis of Moral Reasoning and Moral Emotions
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0087427
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gunes Sevinc, R. Nathan Spreng

Abstract

Human morality has been investigated using a variety of tasks ranging from judgments of hypothetical dilemmas to viewing morally salient stimuli. These experiments have provided insight into neural correlates of moral judgments and emotions, yet these approaches reveal important differences in moral cognition. Moral reasoning tasks require active deliberation while moral emotion tasks involve the perception of stimuli with moral implications. We examined convergent and divergent brain activity associated with these experimental paradigms taking a quantitative meta-analytic approach.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Colombia 2 1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Unknown 169 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 20%
Researcher 24 13%
Student > Bachelor 22 12%
Student > Master 18 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 8%
Other 41 23%
Unknown 22 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 72 40%
Neuroscience 28 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 7%
Social Sciences 11 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Other 19 11%
Unknown 27 15%