↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Ultrasound-Guided Nerve Blocks – Is Documentation and Education Feasible Using Only Text and Pictures?

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Ultrasound-Guided Nerve Blocks – Is Documentation and Education Feasible Using Only Text and Pictures?
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0086966
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bjarne Skjødt Worm, Mette Krag, Kenneth Jensen

Abstract

With the advancement of ultrasound-guidance for peripheral nerve blocks, still pictures from representative ultrasonograms are increasingly used for clinical procedure documentation of the procedure and for educational purposes in textbook materials. However, little is actually known about the clinical and educational usefulness of these still pictures, in particular how well nerve structures can be identified compared to real-time ultrasound examination. We aimed to quantify gross visibility or ultrastructure using still picture sonograms compared to real time ultrasound for trainees and experts, for large or small nerves, and discuss the clinical or educational relevance of these findings.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 4%
United States 1 4%
Unknown 23 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 16%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Student > Postgraduate 3 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Other 5 20%
Unknown 3 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 60%
Computer Science 3 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Engineering 1 4%
Unknown 5 20%