↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Chromosomal Copy Number Aberrations in Colorectal Metastases Resemble Their Primary Counterparts and Differences Are Typically Non-Recurrent

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Chromosomal Copy Number Aberrations in Colorectal Metastases Resemble Their Primary Counterparts and Differences Are Typically Non-Recurrent
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0086833
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leonie J. M. Mekenkamp, Josien C. Haan, Daniëlle Israeli, Hendrik F. B. van Essen, Jeroen R. Dijkstra, Patricia van Cleef, Cornelis J. A. Punt, Gerrit A. Meijer, Iris D. Nagtegaal, Bauke Ylstra

Abstract

The metastatic process is complex and remains a major obstacle in the management of colorectal cancer. To gain a better insight into the pathology of metastasis, we investigated genomic aberrations in a large cohort of matched colorectal cancer primaries and distant metastases from various sites by high resolution array comparative genomic hybridization. In total, 62 primary colorectal cancers, and 68 matched metastases (22 liver, 11 lung, 12 ovary, 12 omentum, and 11 distant lymph nodes) were analyzed. Public datasets were used for validation purposes. Metastases resemble their matched primary tumors in the majority of the patients. This validates the significant overlap in chromosomal aberrations between primary tumors and corresponding metastases observed previously. We observed 15 statistically significant different regions between the primary tumors and their matched metastases, of which only one recurrent event in metastases was observed. We conclude, based on detailed analysis and large independent datasets, that chromosomal copy number aberrations in colorectal metastases resemble their primary counterparts, and differences are typically non-recurrent.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 34%
Researcher 7 22%
Student > Master 6 19%
Professor 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 3 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 4 13%