Title |
From Days to Hours: Reporting Clinically Actionable Variants from Whole Genome Sequencing
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2014
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0086803 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sumit Middha, Saurabh Baheti, Steven N. Hart, Jean-Pierre A. Kocher |
Abstract |
As the cost of whole genome sequencing (WGS) decreases, clinical laboratories will be looking at broadly adopting this technology to screen for variants of clinical significance. To fully leverage this technology in a clinical setting, results need to be reported quickly, as the turnaround rate could potentially impact patient care. The latest sequencers can sequence a whole human genome in about 24 hours. However, depending on the computing infrastructure available, the processing of data can take several days, with the majority of computing time devoted to aligning reads to genomics regions that are to date not clinically interpretable. In an attempt to accelerate the reporting of clinically actionable variants, we have investigated the utility of a multi-step alignment algorithm focused on aligning reads and calling variants in genomic regions of clinical relevance prior to processing the remaining reads on the whole genome. This iterative workflow significantly accelerates the reporting of clinically actionable variants with no loss of accuracy when compared to genotypes obtained with the OMNI SNP platform or to variants detected with a standard workflow that combines Novoalign and GATK. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 8 | 36% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 14% |
Montenegro | 1 | 5% |
Malaysia | 1 | 5% |
Ireland | 1 | 5% |
France | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 7 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 11 | 50% |
Members of the public | 9 | 41% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 10% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
Sweden | 1 | 3% |
Brazil | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 23 | 79% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 10 | 34% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 24% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 14% |
Other | 3 | 10% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 7% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 1 | 3% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 34% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 28% |
Computer Science | 5 | 17% |
Engineering | 2 | 7% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 2 | 7% |