↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Variability of the QuantiFERON®-TB Gold In-Tube Test Using Automated and Manual Methods

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Variability of the QuantiFERON®-TB Gold In-Tube Test Using Automated and Manual Methods
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0086721
Pubmed ID
Authors

William C. Whitworth, Donald J. Goodwin, Laura Racster, Kevin B. West, Stella O. Chuke, Laura J. Daniels, Brandon H. Campbell, Jamaria Bohanon, Atheer T. Jaffar, Wanzer Drane, Paul A. Sjoberg, Gerald H. Mazurek

Abstract

The QuantiFERON®-TB Gold In-Tube test (QFT-GIT) detects Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) infection by measuring release of interferon gamma (IFN-γ) when T-cells (in heparinized whole blood) are stimulated with specific Mtb antigens. The amount of IFN-γ is determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Automation of the ELISA method may reduce variability. To assess the impact of ELISA automation, we compared QFT-GIT results and variability when ELISAs were performed manually and with automation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Other 8 23%
Unknown 6 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 40%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Computer Science 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 6 17%