↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Recommendations for the Empirical Treatment of Complicated Urinary Tract Infections Using Surveillance Data on Antimicrobial Resistance in the Netherlands

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
Title
Recommendations for the Empirical Treatment of Complicated Urinary Tract Infections Using Surveillance Data on Antimicrobial Resistance in the Netherlands
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0086634
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maike Koningstein, Akke K. van der Bij, Marlieke E. A. de Kraker, Jos C. Monen, Jan Muilwijk, Sabine C. de Greeff, Suzanne E. Geerlings, Maurine A. Leverstein- van Hall

Abstract

Complicated urinary tract infections (c-UTIs) are among the most common nosocomial infections and a substantial part of the antimicrobial agents used in hospitals is for the treatment of c-UTIs. Data from surveillance can be used to guide the empirical treatment choices of clinicians when treating c-UTIs. We therefore used nation-wide surveillance data to evaluate antimicrobial coverage of agents for the treatment of c-UTI in the Netherlands.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 91 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Other 9 10%
Student > Postgraduate 8 9%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 18 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 35%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 21 23%