↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Bayesian Dynamical Systems Modelling in the Social Sciences

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Bayesian Dynamical Systems Modelling in the Social Sciences
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0086468
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shyam Ranganathan, Viktoria Spaiser, Richard P. Mann, David J. T. Sumpter

Abstract

Data arising from social systems is often highly complex, involving non-linear relationships between the macro-level variables that characterize these systems. We present a method for analyzing this type of longitudinal or panel data using differential equations. We identify the best non-linear functions that capture interactions between variables, employing Bayes factor to decide how many interaction terms should be included in the model. This method punishes overly complicated models and identifies models with the most explanatory power. We illustrate our approach on the classic example of relating democracy and economic growth, identifying non-linear relationships between these two variables. We show how multiple variables and variable lags can be accounted for and provide a toolbox in R to implement our approach.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 2%
Sweden 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Croatia 1 2%
Unknown 60 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 26%
Researcher 11 17%
Student > Master 9 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Professor 3 5%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 11 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 12 18%
Psychology 8 12%
Mathematics 5 8%
Computer Science 3 5%
Physics and Astronomy 3 5%
Other 19 29%
Unknown 15 23%