Title |
Do the Rich Get Richer? An Empirical Analysis of the Bitcoin Transaction Network
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2014
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0086197 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Dániel Kondor, Márton Pósfai, István Csabai, Gábor Vattay |
Abstract |
The possibility to analyze everyday monetary transactions is limited by the scarcity of available data, as this kind of information is usually considered highly sensitive. Present econophysics models are usually employed on presumed random networks of interacting agents, and only some macroscopic properties (e.g. the resulting wealth distribution) are compared to real-world data. In this paper, we analyze Bitcoin, which is a novel digital currency system, where the complete list of transactions is publicly available. Using this dataset, we reconstruct the network of transactions and extract the time and amount of each payment. We analyze the structure of the transaction network by measuring network characteristics over time, such as the degree distribution, degree correlations and clustering. We find that linear preferential attachment drives the growth of the network. We also study the dynamics taking place on the transaction network, i.e. the flow of money. We measure temporal patterns and the wealth accumulation. Investigating the microscopic statistics of money movement, we find that sublinear preferential attachment governs the evolution of the wealth distribution. We report a scaling law between the degree and wealth associated to individual nodes. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 16 | 25% |
Italy | 3 | 5% |
Germany | 3 | 5% |
Canada | 2 | 3% |
France | 2 | 3% |
Portugal | 1 | 2% |
Paraguay | 1 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Belgium | 1 | 2% |
Other | 9 | 14% |
Unknown | 26 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 45 | 69% |
Scientists | 18 | 28% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 1% |
Italy | 3 | <1% |
Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
Germany | 2 | <1% |
Australia | 2 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Finland | 1 | <1% |
India | 1 | <1% |
Other | 5 | 1% |
Unknown | 375 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 84 | 21% |
Student > Master | 71 | 18% |
Researcher | 43 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 40 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 4% |
Other | 70 | 18% |
Unknown | 73 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 110 | 28% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 43 | 11% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 33 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 29 | 7% |
Physics and Astronomy | 25 | 6% |
Other | 66 | 17% |
Unknown | 91 | 23% |