Title |
Fitting Characteristics of N95 Filtering-Facepiece Respirators Used Widely in China
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, January 2014
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0085299 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yanyan Yu, Luman Jiang, Ziqing Zhuang, Yuewei Liu, Xinyan Wang, Juyuan Liu, Mingna Yang, Weihong Chen |
Abstract |
Millions of people rely on N95 filtering facepiece respirators to reduce the risk of airborne particles and prevent them from respiratory infections. However, there are no respirator fit testing and training regulations in China. Meanwhile, no study has been conducted to investigate the fit of various respirators. The objective of this study was to investigate whether people obtained adequate fit when wearing N95 filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) used widely in China. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 21% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 21% |
China | 2 | 14% |
Singapore | 1 | 7% |
Australia | 1 | 7% |
Denmark | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 3 | 21% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 64% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 21% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
Chile | 1 | 2% |
Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 53 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 9 | 16% |
Researcher | 8 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 14% |
Other | 4 | 7% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 7% |
Other | 8 | 14% |
Unknown | 15 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 13% |
Engineering | 5 | 9% |
Environmental Science | 5 | 9% |
Design | 3 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
Other | 12 | 21% |
Unknown | 22 | 39% |