↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

PSCC: Sensitive and Reliable Population-Scale Copy Number Variation Detection Method Based on Low Coverage Sequencing

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
Title
PSCC: Sensitive and Reliable Population-Scale Copy Number Variation Detection Method Based on Low Coverage Sequencing
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0085096
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xuchao Li, Shengpei Chen, Weiwei Xie, Ida Vogel, Kwong Wai Choy, Fang Chen, Rikke Christensen, Chunlei Zhang, Huijuan Ge, Haojun Jiang, Chang Yu, Fang Huang, Wei Wang, Hui Jiang, Xiuqing Zhang

Abstract

Copy number variations (CNVs) represent an important type of genetic variation that deeply impact phenotypic polymorphisms and human diseases. The advent of high-throughput sequencing technologies provides an opportunity to revolutionize the discovery of CNVs and to explore their relationship with diseases. However, most of the existing methods depend on sequencing depth and show instability with low sequence coverage. In this study, using low coverage whole-genome sequencing (LCS) we have developed an effective population-scale CNV calling (PSCC) method.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 2%
Unknown 62 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 22%
Researcher 12 19%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Master 5 8%
Other 4 6%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 11 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 25%
Computer Science 5 8%
Unspecified 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 11 17%