↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Using Multiple Types of Studies in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions – A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
174 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Using Multiple Types of Studies in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions – A Systematic Review
Published in
PLOS ONE, December 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0085035
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frank Peinemann, Doreen Allen Tushabe, Jos Kleijnen

Abstract

A systematic review may evaluate different aspects of a health care intervention. To accommodate the evaluation of various research questions, the inclusion of more than one study design may be necessary. One aim of this study is to find and describe articles on methodological issues concerning the incorporation of multiple types of study designs in systematic reviews on health care interventions. Another aim is to evaluate methods studies that have assessed whether reported effects differ by study types.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 173 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 10%
Researcher 15 9%
Student > Bachelor 15 9%
Student > Postgraduate 8 5%
Other 33 19%
Unknown 49 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 20%
Psychology 11 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Other 23 13%
Unknown 55 32%