↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

MR-Less Surface-Based Amyloid Assessment Based on 11C PiB PET

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
MR-Less Surface-Based Amyloid Assessment Based on 11C PiB PET
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0084777
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luping Zhou, Olivier Salvado, Vincent Dore, Pierrick Bourgeat, Parnesh Raniga, S. Lance Macaulay, David Ames, Colin L. Masters, Kathryn A. Ellis, Victor L. Villemagne, Christopher C. Rowe, Jurgen Fripp

Abstract

β-amyloid (Aβ) plaques in brain's grey matter (GM) are one of the pathological hallmarks of Alzheimer's disease (AD), and can be imaged in vivo using Positron Emission Tomography (PET) with (11)C or (18)F radiotracers. Estimating Aβ burden in cortical GM has been shown to improve diagnosis and monitoring of AD. However, lacking structural information in PET images requires such assessments to be performed with anatomical MRI scans, which may not be available at different clinical settings or being contraindicated for particular reasons. This study aimed to develop an MR-less Aβ imaging quantification method that requires only PET images for reliable Aβ burden estimations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 62 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 22%
Researcher 12 19%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 4 6%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 15 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 22%
Neuroscience 9 14%
Psychology 9 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 16 25%