↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Cascading Failures in Spatially-Embedded Random Networks

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Cascading Failures in Spatially-Embedded Random Networks
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0084563
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea Asztalos, Sameet Sreenivasan, Boleslaw K. Szymanski, Gyorgy Korniss

Abstract

Cascading failures constitute an important vulnerability of interconnected systems. Here we focus on the study of such failures on networks in which the connectivity of nodes is constrained by geographical distance. Specifically, we use random geometric graphs as representative examples of such spatial networks, and study the properties of cascading failures on them in the presence of distributed flow. The key finding of this study is that the process of cascading failures is non-self-averaging on spatial networks, and thus, aggregate inferences made from analyzing an ensemble of such networks lead to incorrect conclusions when applied to a single network, no matter how large the network is. We demonstrate that this lack of self-averaging disappears with the introduction of a small fraction of long-range links into the network. We simulate the well studied preemptive node removal strategy for cascade mitigation and show that it is largely ineffective in the case of spatial networks. We introduce an altruistic strategy designed to limit the loss of network nodes in the event of a cascade triggering failure and show that it performs better than the preemptive strategy. Finally, we consider a real-world spatial network viz. a European power transmission network and validate that our findings from the study of random geometric graphs are also borne out by simulations of cascading failures on the empirical network.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 24%
Professor 4 16%
Researcher 3 12%
Other 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Other 5 20%
Unknown 2 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 6 24%
Engineering 5 20%
Computer Science 5 20%
Mathematics 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 5 20%