↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Does Sympathy Motivate Prosocial Behaviour in Great Apes?

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
Title
Does Sympathy Motivate Prosocial Behaviour in Great Apes?
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0084299
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katja Liebal, Amrisha Vaish, Daniel Haun, Michael Tomasello

Abstract

Prosocial behaviours such as helping, comforting, or sharing are central to human social life. Because they emerge early in ontogeny, it has been proposed that humans are prosocial by nature and that from early on empathy and sympathy motivate such behaviours. The emerging question is whether humans share these abilities to feel with and for someone with our closest relatives, the great apes. Although several studies demonstrated that great apes help others, little is known about their underlying motivations. This study addresses this issue and investigates whether four species of great apes (Pongo pygmaeus, Gorilla gorilla, Pan troglodytes, Pan paniscus) help a conspecific more after observing the conspecific being harmed (a human experimenter steals the conspecific's food) compared to a condition where no harming occurred. Results showed that in regard to the occurrence of prosocial behaviours, only orangutans, but not the African great apes, help others when help is needed, contrasting prior findings on chimpanzees. However, with the exception of one population of orangutans that helped significantly more after a conspecific was harmed than when no harm occurred, prosocial behaviour in great apes was not motivated by concern for others.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 2%
Austria 2 2%
Italy 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 119 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 22%
Student > Bachelor 22 17%
Student > Master 17 13%
Researcher 15 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 18 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 26%
Psychology 31 24%
Social Sciences 11 9%
Environmental Science 5 4%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 26 20%