↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Compositional Discrimination of Decompression and Decomposition Gas Bubbles in Bycaught Seals and Dolphins

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
Compositional Discrimination of Decompression and Decomposition Gas Bubbles in Bycaught Seals and Dolphins
Published in
PLOS ONE, December 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0083994
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yara Bernaldo de Quirós, Jeffrey S. Seewald, Sean P. Sylva, Bill Greer, Misty Niemeyer, Andrea L. Bogomolni, Michael J. Moore

Abstract

Gas bubbles in marine mammals entangled and drowned in gillnets have been previously described by computed tomography, gross examination and histopathology. The absence of bacteria or autolytic changes in the tissues of those animals suggested that the gas was produced peri- or post-mortem by a fast decompression, probably by quickly hauling animals entangled in the net at depth to the surface. Gas composition analysis and gas scoring are two new diagnostic tools available to distinguish gas embolisms from putrefaction gases. With this goal, these methods have been successfully applied to pathological studies of marine mammals. In this study, we characterized the flux and composition of the gas bubbles from bycaught marine mammals in anchored sink gillnets and bottom otter trawls. We compared these data with marine mammals stranded on Cape Cod, MA, USA. Fresh animals or with moderate decomposition (decomposition scores of 2 and 3) were prioritized. Results showed that bycaught animals presented with significantly higher gas scores than stranded animals. Gas composition analyses indicate that gas was formed by decompression, confirming the decompression hypothesis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Argentina 2 3%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 74 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 18%
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Other 11 14%
Student > Master 8 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 16 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 39%
Environmental Science 13 17%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 4%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 16 21%