↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Books Average Previous Decade of Economic Misery

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
14 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
80 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
Books Average Previous Decade of Economic Misery
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0083147
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. Alexander Bentley, Alberto Acerbi, Paul Ormerod, Vasileios Lampos

Abstract

For the 20(th) century since the Depression, we find a strong correlation between a 'literary misery index' derived from English language books and a moving average of the previous decade of the annual U.S. economic misery index, which is the sum of inflation and unemployment rates. We find a peak in the goodness of fit at 11 years for the moving average. The fit between the two misery indices holds when using different techniques to measure the literary misery index, and this fit is significantly better than other possible correlations with different emotion indices. To check the robustness of the results, we also analysed books written in German language and obtained very similar correlations with the German economic misery index. The results suggest that millions of books published every year average the authors' shared economic experiences over the past decade.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 80 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Nigeria 6 10%
United Kingdom 4 7%
Germany 1 2%
Japan 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Luxembourg 1 2%
Unknown 45 76%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 24%
Researcher 12 20%
Student > Master 9 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Other 5 8%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 2 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 14 24%
Arts and Humanities 7 12%
Psychology 5 8%
Computer Science 5 8%
Linguistics 4 7%
Other 18 31%
Unknown 6 10%