↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

A Simulation Approach to Assessing Sampling Strategies for Insect Pests: An Example with the Balsam Gall Midge

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
A Simulation Approach to Assessing Sampling Strategies for Insect Pests: An Example with the Balsam Gall Midge
Published in
PLOS ONE, December 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0082618
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. Drew Carleton, Stephen B. Heard, Peter J. Silk

Abstract

Estimation of pest density is a basic requirement for integrated pest management in agriculture and forestry, and efficiency in density estimation is a common goal. Sequential sampling techniques promise efficient sampling, but their application can involve cumbersome mathematics and/or intensive warm-up sampling when pests have complex within- or between-site distributions. We provide tools for assessing the efficiency of sequential sampling and of alternative, simpler sampling plans, using computer simulation with "pre-sampling" data. We illustrate our approach using data for balsam gall midge (Paradiplosis tumifex) attack in Christmas tree farms. Paradiplosis tumifex proved recalcitrant to sequential sampling techniques. Midge distributions could not be fit by a common negative binomial distribution across sites. Local parameterization, using warm-up samples to estimate the clumping parameter k for each site, performed poorly: k estimates were unreliable even for samples of n ∼ 100 trees. These methods were further confounded by significant within-site spatial autocorrelation. Much simpler sampling schemes, involving random or belt-transect sampling to preset sample sizes, were effective and efficient for P. tumifex. Sampling via belt transects (through the longest dimension of a stand) was the most efficient, with sample means converging on true mean density for sample sizes of n ∼ 25-40 trees. Pre-sampling and simulation techniques provide a simple method for assessing sampling strategies for estimating insect infestation. We suspect that many pests will resemble P. tumifex in challenging the assumptions of sequential sampling methods. Our software will allow practitioners to optimize sampling strategies before they are brought to real-world applications, while potentially avoiding the need for the cumbersome calculations required for sequential sampling methods.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 21%
Researcher 6 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 18%
Professor 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 7 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 33%
Environmental Science 5 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 9 27%