Title |
Micro-Biomechanics of the Kebara 2 Hyoid and Its Implications for Speech in Neanderthals
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, December 2013
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0082261 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ruggero D’Anastasio, Stephen Wroe, Claudio Tuniz, Lucia Mancini, Deneb T. Cesana, Diego Dreossi, Mayoorendra Ravichandiran, Marie Attard, William C. H. Parr, Anne Agur, Luigi Capasso |
Abstract |
The description of a Neanderthal hyoid from Kebara Cave (Israel) in 1989 fuelled scientific debate on the evolution of speech and complex language. Gross anatomy of the Kebara 2 hyoid differs little from that of modern humans. However, whether Homo neanderthalensis could use speech or complex language remains controversial. Similarity in overall shape does not necessarily demonstrate that the Kebara 2 hyoid was used in the same way as that of Homo sapiens. The mechanical performance of whole bones is partly controlled by internal trabecular geometries, regulated by bone-remodelling in response to the forces applied. Here we show that the Neanderthal and modern human hyoids also present very similar internal architectures and micro-biomechanical behaviours. Our study incorporates detailed analysis of histology, meticulous reconstruction of musculature, and computational biomechanical analysis with models incorporating internal micro-geometry. Because internal architecture reflects the loadings to which a bone is routinely subjected, our findings are consistent with a capacity for speech in the Neanderthals. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 12 | 19% |
United Kingdom | 7 | 11% |
Canada | 3 | 5% |
Germany | 2 | 3% |
Italy | 1 | 2% |
Hong Kong | 1 | 2% |
Australia | 1 | 2% |
Spain | 1 | 2% |
New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
Other | 6 | 9% |
Unknown | 29 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 49 | 77% |
Scientists | 13 | 20% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 5 | 3% |
France | 2 | 1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 174 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 46 | 25% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 16% |
Researcher | 28 | 15% |
Student > Master | 17 | 9% |
Professor | 13 | 7% |
Other | 29 | 16% |
Unknown | 22 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 41 | 22% |
Arts and Humanities | 33 | 18% |
Social Sciences | 22 | 12% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 5% |
Psychology | 8 | 4% |
Other | 47 | 26% |
Unknown | 24 | 13% |