↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Replicability and Heterogeneity of Awake Unrestrained Canine fMRI Responses

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
32 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
Title
Replicability and Heterogeneity of Awake Unrestrained Canine fMRI Responses
Published in
PLOS ONE, December 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0081698
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gregory S. Berns, Andrew Brooks, Mark Spivak

Abstract

Previously, we demonstrated the possibility of fMRI in two awake and unrestrained dogs. Here, we determined the replicability and heterogeneity of these results in an additional 11 dogs for a total of 13 subjects. Based on an anatomically placed region-of-interest, we compared the caudate response to a hand signal indicating the imminent availability of a food reward to a hand signal indicating no reward. 8 of 13 dogs had a positive differential caudate response to the signal indicating reward. The mean differential caudate response was 0.09%, which was similar to a comparable human study. These results show that canine fMRI is reliable and can be done with minimal stress to the dogs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 4%
Hungary 3 3%
Austria 1 1%
Unknown 85 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 28%
Other 12 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 13%
Student > Master 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 9 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 31%
Psychology 14 15%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 9 10%
Neuroscience 9 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 14 15%