↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Women Are Better at Selecting Gifts than Men

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
92 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Women Are Better at Selecting Gifts than Men
Published in
PLOS ONE, December 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0081643
Pubmed ID
Authors

Monique M. H. Pollmann, Ilja van Beest

Abstract

There is a widespread belief that women are better at selecting gifts than men; however, this claim has not been assessed on the basis of objective criteria. The current studies do exactly that and show that women do indeed make better gift selections for others, regardless of the gender of the receiver and the type of relationship between the giver and receiver. We investigate the mediating role of different aspects of interpersonal sensitivity and reveal that differences in interpersonal interest (measured with an autism questionnaire), but not differences in interpersonal reactivity, explain gender differences in gift selection quality. The current studies thus present the first objective evidence for the claim that women are better in selecting gifts for others and also give an indication of why this is the case.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 92 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Portugal 1 3%
France 1 3%
Luxembourg 1 3%
Unknown 32 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 19%
Student > Master 5 14%
Other 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 8 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 11 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Computer Science 2 6%
Other 7 19%
Unknown 9 25%