↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Analytic Review of Modeling Studies of ARV Based PrEP Interventions Reveals Strong Influence of Drug-Resistance Assumptions on the Population-Level Effectiveness

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
Analytic Review of Modeling Studies of ARV Based PrEP Interventions Reveals Strong Influence of Drug-Resistance Assumptions on the Population-Level Effectiveness
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0080927
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dobromir Dimitrov, Marie-Claude Boily, Elizabeth R. Brown, Timothy B. Hallett

Abstract

Four clinical trials have shown that oral and topical pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) based on tenofovir may be effective in preventing HIV transmission. The expected reduction in HIV transmission and the projected prevalence of drug resistance due to PrEP use vary significantly across modeling studies as a result of the broad spectrum of assumptions employed. Our goal is to quantify the influence of drug resistance assumptions on the predicted population-level impact of PrEP.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 55 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Researcher 5 9%
Other 5 9%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 12 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 16 28%