↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Pain and Pessimism: Dairy Calves Exhibit Negative Judgement Bias following Hot-Iron Disbudding

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
16 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
113 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
246 Mendeley
Title
Pain and Pessimism: Dairy Calves Exhibit Negative Judgement Bias following Hot-Iron Disbudding
Published in
PLOS ONE, December 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0080556
Pubmed ID
Authors

Heather W. Neave, Rolnei R. Daros, João H. C. Costa, Marina A. G. von Keyserlingk, Daniel M. Weary

Abstract

Pain is defined as an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage, but emotional states are difficult to directly assess in animals. Researchers have assessed pain using behavioural and physiological measures, but these approaches are limited to understanding the arousal rather than valence of the emotional experience. Cognitive bias tasks show that depressed humans judge ambiguous events negatively and this technique has been applied to assess emotional states in animals. However, limited research has examined how pain states affect cognitive processes in animals. Here we present the first evidence of cognitive bias in response to pain in any non-human species. In two experiments, dairy calves (n = 17) were trained to respond differentially to red and white video screens and then tested with unreinforced ambiguous colours in two or three test sessions before and two sessions after the routine practice of hot-iron disbudding. After disbudding calves were more likely to judge ambiguous colours as negative. This 'pessimistic' bias indicates that post-operative pain following hot-iron disbudding results in a negative change in emotional state.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 246 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 2%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 238 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 47 19%
Student > Bachelor 43 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 17%
Researcher 26 11%
Other 14 6%
Other 35 14%
Unknown 40 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 115 47%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 31 13%
Psychology 13 5%
Environmental Science 6 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 2%
Other 21 9%
Unknown 56 23%