↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

The Development of the Mental Representations of the Magnitude of Fractions

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
The Development of the Mental Representations of the Magnitude of Fractions
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0080016
Pubmed ID
Authors

Florence C. Gabriel, Denes Szucs, Alain Content

Abstract

We investigated the development of the mental representation of the magnitude of fractions during the initial stages of fraction learning in grade 5, 6 and 7 children as well as in adults. We examined the activation of global fraction magnitude in a numerical comparison task and a matching task. There were global distance effects in the comparison task, but not in the matching task. This suggests that the activation of the global magnitude representation of fractions is not automatic in all tasks involving magnitude judgments. The slope of the global distance effect increased during early fraction learning and declined by adulthood, demonstrating that the development of the fraction global distance effect differs from that of the integer distance effect.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 2%
Unknown 51 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 21%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Researcher 4 8%
Professor 3 6%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 9 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 22 42%
Mathematics 5 10%
Social Sciences 4 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 12 23%