↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Cross-Language Opinion Lexicon Extraction Using Mutual-Reinforcement Label Propagation

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Cross-Language Opinion Lexicon Extraction Using Mutual-Reinforcement Label Propagation
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0079294
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zheng Lin, Songbo Tan, Yue Liu, Xueqi Cheng, Xueke Xu

Abstract

There is a growing interest in automatically building opinion lexicon from sources such as product reviews. Most of these methods depend on abundant external resources such as WordNet, which limits the applicability of these methods. Unsupervised or semi-supervised learning provides an optional solution to multilingual opinion lexicon extraction. However, the datasets are imbalanced in different languages. For some languages, the high-quality corpora are scarce or hard to obtain, which limits the research progress. To solve the above problems, we explore a mutual-reinforcement label propagation framework. First, for each language, a label propagation algorithm is applied to a word relation graph, and then a bilingual dictionary is used as a bridge to transfer information between two languages. A key advantage of this model is its ability to make two languages learn from each other and boost each other. The experimental results show that the proposed approach outperforms baseline significantly.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 27%
Student > Master 2 18%
Student > Postgraduate 2 18%
Researcher 1 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 6 55%
Environmental Science 1 9%
Linguistics 1 9%
Social Sciences 1 9%
Unknown 2 18%