↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Age-Dependent Face Detection and Face Categorization Performance

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
Title
Age-Dependent Face Detection and Face Categorization Performance
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0079164
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claus-Christian Carbon, Martina Grüter, Thomas Grüter

Abstract

Empirical studies on the development of face processing skills with age show inconsistent patterns concerning qualitative vs. quantitative changes over time or the age range for peak cognitive performance. In the present study, we tested the proficiency in face detection and face categorization with a large sample of participants (N = 312; age range: 2-88 yrs). As test objects, we used so-called Mooney faces, two-tone (black and white) images of faces lacking critical information of a local, featural and relational nature, reflecting difficult real world face processing conditions. We found that performance in the assessment of gender and age from Mooney faces increases up to about age 15, and decreases from 65 years on. The implications of these findings are discussed in the light of classic and recent findings from face development literature.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 49 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 18%
Researcher 8 16%
Student > Bachelor 8 16%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Other 12 24%
Unknown 5 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 23 45%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 8%
Computer Science 3 6%
Neuroscience 3 6%
Environmental Science 3 6%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 6 12%