↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Modeling Disease Severity in Multiple Sclerosis Using Electronic Health Records

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Modeling Disease Severity in Multiple Sclerosis Using Electronic Health Records
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0078927
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zongqi Xia, Elizabeth Secor, Lori B. Chibnik, Riley M. Bove, Suchun Cheng, Tanuja Chitnis, Andrew Cagan, Vivian S. Gainer, Pei J. Chen, Katherine P. Liao, Stanley Y. Shaw, Ashwin N. Ananthakrishnan, Peter Szolovits, Howard L. Weiner, Elizabeth W. Karlson, Shawn N. Murphy, Guergana K. Savova, Tianxi Cai, Susanne E. Churchill, Robert M. Plenge, Isaac S. Kohane, Philip L. De Jager

Abstract

To optimally leverage the scalability and unique features of the electronic health records (EHR) for research that would ultimately improve patient care, we need to accurately identify patients and extract clinically meaningful measures. Using multiple sclerosis (MS) as a proof of principle, we showcased how to leverage routinely collected EHR data to identify patients with a complex neurological disorder and derive an important surrogate measure of disease severity heretofore only available in research settings.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Finland 1 <1%
Unknown 123 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 16%
Researcher 20 16%
Student > Master 13 10%
Unspecified 11 9%
Other 10 8%
Other 34 27%
Unknown 18 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 25%
Computer Science 13 10%
Unspecified 11 9%
Psychology 9 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Other 28 22%
Unknown 28 22%